The AR group showed medium to large effect sizes on all measures over time, suggesting clinically significant outcomes. Improvement over time was observed for participants in both groups, with greater improvement seen for the AR than the CT group on all outcome measures. ![]() There was a statistically significant main effect of time for all measures. The two groups were statistically equivalent on all outcome measures at pre-assessment. Repeated-measures ANOVA and planned contrasts were used to compare group performance on AzBio Sentences, Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI), and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). Assessments were completed pretreatment and 1 week and 2 months posttreatment. Twenty postlingually deafened adult CI users participated. Each group completed 6 weekly 90-min individual treatment sessions delivered remotely. The control group participants engaged in cognitive stimulation activities (crosswords, sudoku, etc.). The AR protocol consisted of auditory training (words, sentences, and speech tracking), informational counseling, and communication strategies. ![]() This was a multisite clinical study with participants randomized to either an AR treatment or active control group. This randomized controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of a Telehealth Aural Rehabilitation (TeleAR) training protocol to improve outcomes for adult cochlear implant (CI) users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |